The Variation of ridge density in palm prints among Nigerian ethnic populations and its forensic use for sex determination.

  • Moses Olusola Adetona Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan
  • Mathew Temitayo Shokunbi

Abstract

Friction ridge skin has unique features that persist from before birth until decomposition after death. Finger and palm print identification is based on two primary factors: uniqueness and permanence. Ridge density (ridge count in a defined area) has been explored for its applicability in inference of sex from the fingerprints and palm prints recovered at the crime scene.

In this study, we examined the variability of palm ridge density (PRD) from palm prints among Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba ethnic groups and its ability to infer sex in forensic examinations.

 

The sample consisted of bilateral palm prints of 560 healthy adults (251 females and 309 males) from three ethnic groups in southwestern states. The prints were manually analyzed in four defined areas (PRD-1, PRD-2, PRD-3 and PRD-4) and the values aggregated. The ethnic and sex differences in palm print ridge densities were statistically analyzed for each of the designated areas.

 

The mean(SD) aggregate PRD values were 11.49(1.48) for Hausa, 10.75(1.46) for Igbo and 11.71(1.64) for Yoruba; were significantly different between the ethnic groups (p<0.05) and significantly greater (p<0.05) in females than in males 11.71(1.53) vs 9.93(1.02). The aggregate mean (SD) ridge densities were also significant different p<0.05) between the right and left hands 11.09(1.05) and 9.33(1.14) respectively. Is the gender difference aggregate for all the ethnic groups, and if so the figures for each group should be separately stated.

 

This study showed significant differences in palm ridge densities among Nigerian major ethnic groups. There are also gender, right and left hand differences in this dermatoglyphic parameter. These results have forensic implications.

References

REFERENCES
Abd-elaleem S.A., Hassan E.I., Asem Mohammed M.M. 2017. Determination of Sex and Stature
from Latent Palm Prints Present on Documents in Egyptian Population Sample. Int J Forensic Sci Pathol. 5(4), 360-369.

Adetona, Oladapo and Akinyemi. 2012. Palmar Flexion Creases Variants among Nigerians.
Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 15: 93 – 96.

Acree, M. A. 1999. Is there a gender difference in fingerprint ridge density? Forensic science
international, 102(1), 35-44.

Amit C., Singh J., Kushwaha K.P. 2015. An evaluation: sexing from the ridge density of latent
palm prints of North Indian Population. Res J Recent Sci. 4: 73-75.

Crawford, M.H., Duggirala, R. 1992. Digital dermatoglyphic patterns of Eskimo and
Amerindian populations: Relationships between geographic, dermatoglyphic, genetic, and
linguistic distances. Human Biology 64(5): 683-704.

Cummins, H., Midlo, C. 1943. Finger prints, palms and soles. An introduction to
Dermatoglyphics. 1st ed. Dover Publications, Inc. New York.

Froehlich, J.W., Giles, E. 1981. A multivariate approach to fingerprint variation in Papua New
Guinea: Perspectives on the evolutionary stability of dermatoglyphic markers American
Journal of Physical Anthropology 54(1): 93–106.

Gutiérrez-Redomero, E., Sánchez-Andrés, A., Rivaldería, N., Alonso-Rodríguez, C., Dipierri,
J.E., Martín, L.M., 2013a. A comparative study of topological and sex differences in
fingerprint ridge density in Argentinian and Spanish population samples. J. Forensic Leg.
Med. 20: 419–429.

Jain, A. K., Prabhakar, S., Pankanti, S. 2002. On the similarity of identical twin fingerprints.
Pattern Recognition, 35(11), 2653-2663.

Jantz R.L. 1987. Anthropological Dermatoglyphic Research. Annual Reviews of Anthropology
16:161-77.

Jantz R.L. 1997. Variation among European populations in summary finger ridge-count
variables, Ann. Hum. Biol. 24(2): 97–106.

Jantz R.L., Owsley D.W. 1977. Factor analysis of finger ridge-counts in Blacks and Whites Ann.
Hum. Biol. (4): 357–366.

Jantz R.L., Parham K.R. (1978). Racial differences in dermal ridge breadth, Hum. Biol. 50(1):
33–40.

Karmakar, B., Malkin, L., Kobyliansky, E. 2005. Asymmetry and Diversity of Dermatoglyphic
traits: Population comparison in five endogamous groups of West Bengal, India.
Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 365-391.

Kapoor, N., Badiye, A. 2015. Sex differences in the thumbprint ridge density in a central Indian
population. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 5(1), 23-29.

Krishan, K., Kanchan, T., Sharma, R., Pathania, A. 2014. Variability of palmprint ridge density
in a North Indian population and its use in inference of sex in forensic examinations.
HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 65(6), 476-488.

Machado, J. F., Fernandes, P. R., Roquetti, R. W., Fernandes Filho, J. 2010. Digital dermatoglyphic heritability differences as evidenced by a female twin study. Twin
Research and Human Genetics 13(05): 482-489

Mi M.P., Budy A.M., Rashad M.N. (1982). A population study of finger dermal patterns and
ridge counts, in: C.S. Bartsocas (Ed.). Progress In Dermatoglyphic Research, Alan R.
Liss, New York, pp. 285–293.

Moore R.T. 1994. Automatic fingerprint identification systems, in: H.C. Lee, R.E. Gaensslen
(Eds.), Advances in Fingerprint Technology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 164–191.

Muller-Ford, C. S. 2004. Analysis of dermatoglyphic heritability: A study of phenotypic
relationships. Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers. Paper 6393.

Nayak, V.C., Rastogi, P., Kanchan, T., Yoganarasimha, K., Kumar, G.P., Menezes, R.G. 2010.
Sex differences from fingerprint ridge density in Chinese and Malaysian population.
Forensic Science International 197: 67–69.

Ozor Nwafia C.P., Emelobe C.S.., Igbigbi P.S., & Ozor C.K. (2018). Dermatoglyphic patterns of female convicted criminals in Anambra state. Forensic Res Criminol Int J. 2018;6(4):294‒296.
Stoney D.A., Thornton J.L. (1986). A method for the description of minutia pairs in epidermal ridge patterns. J. Forensic Sci. (31): 1217–1234.
Zhou, Y., Zeng, Y., Hu, L., Hu, W. 2001. Application and development of palm print
Research. Technology and Health Care 10 (2002) 383–390.
.
Published
2019-02-20
Section
Section B (Basic Science Research)